How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation.
Factors identified in investigations of trait structure (e.g., the Big Five) are sometimes understood as explanations or sources of the covariation of distinct behavioral traits, as when extraversion is suggested to underlie the covariation of assertiveness and sociability. Here, we detail how trait covariation can alternatively be understood as arising from units common to functionalist and pr...
متن کاملHow scientific models can explain
Scientific models invariably involve some degree of idealization, abstraction, or fictionalization of their target system. Nonetheless, I argue that there are circumstances under which such false models can offer genuine scientific explanations. After reviewing three different proposals in the literature for how models can explain, I shall introduce a more general account of what I call model e...
متن کاملHow can causal explanations explain ? ?
The mechanistic and causal accounts of explanation are often conflated to yield a ‘causal-mechanical’ account. This paper prizes them apart and asks: if the mechanistic account is correct, how can causal explanations be explanatory? The answer to this question varies according to how causality itself is understood. It is argued that difference-making, mechanistic, dualist and inferentialist acc...
متن کاملInflation Persistence: How Much Can We Explain?
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta E C O N O M I C R E V I E W Second Quarter 2003 M onetary policy is a controversial topic. Economists are still divided into two factions: those who believe that monetary policy does have real (inflation-adjusted) effects and those who are convinced that it affects only nominal variables, that is, nominal interest rates and prices. Until recently, almost any macr...
متن کاملHow speculation can explain the equity premium
When measured over decades in countries that have been relatively stable, returns from stocks have been substantially better than returns from bonds. This is often attributed to investors’ risk aversion: stocks are thought to be riskier than bonds, and so investors will pay less for an expected return from stocks than for the same expected return from bonds. The game-theoretic probability-free ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychological Review
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1939-1471,0033-295X
DOI: 10.1037/a0038423